 |

|
|
| Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education (CAPE) |
 |

Contact:
Arnold Aprill
,
Founding and Creative Director
Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education
203 N. Wabash, Suite 1720
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone:
312-870-6140 ext. 141
|
 |

Fax: 312-870-6147
Email: aaprill@capeweb.org
Web Address: Visit web site |
 |

Approach: Arts integration, cultural organization and school partnerships.

Partners: Chicago Public Schools Gail Burnaford, Florida Atlantic University Larry Scripp – New England Conservatory Cynthia Weiss – Columbia College Catherine Main – University of Illinois at Chicago

Description: The Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education (CAPE) is a network of Chicago public schools, including classroom teachers, arts specialists, and administrators; professional arts organizations and teaching artists; and university-based researchers and teacher educators. CAPE serves as a mediating agency, a catalyst, funder, and convener. It brings people together around research, school improvement, and the arts. You belong to this community – “CAPE schools” and “CAPE artists” are frequently used terms. Together, they comprise a learning community looking deeply at the role of arts education partnerships in professional development (Aprill and Burnaford).
Purpose
Vision: All students have the right to equitable access to art in their lives and in their schools.
Mission: To improve student learning by partnering with schools to integrate the arts into curriculum.
Strategies:
- Advancing innovative arts integration practice and policy in both education and the arts
- Actively participating in professional dialogue with practitioners, researchers, and leaders.
Action: To improve schools by building the capacities of educators, artists, and others to work together on behalf of students.

Structures: At the center of CAPE’s work are arts education partnerships. Longtime collaborators Arnold Aprill (Founding and Creative Director, CAPE) and Gail Burnaford (professor, Florida Atlantic University) define these as “long-term relationships in which artists and teachers and arts organizations and schools co-design and implement shared new roles for the arts in learning over time.” Source:(Aprill and Burnaford) In this approach, the learning focus connects the arts to math, social studies, language arts, science, etc. Within these relationships, CAPE helps encourage leadership, constructivist teaching approaches, and reflective practice that keeps student work in mind (Aprill).
Inquiry and action research. Along with the culture of partnership comes a practice of inquiry. The network asks itself individually, in teams, and as a whole: What are students learning from this arts partnership? What are teachers learning from becoming an arts partner? What evidence do we have it is making a difference? Mirroring school-based teams, CAPE’s artist leaders learn from education research partners, together helping the network work toward ongoing improvement. This approach unites professional development and practitioner research. Veterans and novices are each given their own specific support.
The professional development inquiry cycle:
- Develop innovative approaches to instruction and curriculum through direct classroom collaboration
- Identify their questions about their shared practice
- Create and share data collection instruments with others in the network to answer questions
- Collect data around site specific and cross-site questions
- Arrange the collected evidence into multi-media and hard copy documentation; share with public (see Useful Tools).
- Network helps critique documentation in cross-site meetings and researcher document examination and interviews
- Researchers analyze across partnerships, develop assessment tools grounded in the action research questions to examine practices cross-site
Their own innovators guide the network: The approach has evolved, benefiting from what educators, researchers, and cultural workers learn from the practice and the research. CAPE describes principles learned from its innovative schools:
- Constructivist learning (in which learners construct their own meanings and discover their own understandings of learned concepts and content)
- Parent involvement
- Teacher-Led Professional development
- Teacher collaboration and leadership
- Reflective practice (in which teachers and students collectively examine and analyze their learning and teaching processes and products)
- Multiple modes of assessment
- Authentic audiences for student work
- Share promising practices widely. Grounded with evidence, the network delves into the nuts and bolts of what works why. Then, when students, parents, and education and arts administrators join the discussion, they can tie the approach to concrete examples of learning. Professional development becomes “two-way and multidimensional” Moving away from the arts-service provider model, everyone learns and benefits. (Aprill and Burnaford) p.5.
Differentiate the professional development:
- Novice teachers. Help them understand they are leaders. Help them learn to plan. Honor their innovation. Design professional development specifically for novice teachers.
- Veteran teachers give back. Most workshops led by veteran teachers.
- Veteran CAPE schools open their doors. Parents, new partners, and those interested in observing this learning community in action are welcomed into veteran CAPE schools to see how arts integrated into school life feels and looks.
Parents can teach, learn, and grow. Parents participate as coordinators of partnerships, projects, and other programs involving other parents. Some are teaching artists, work in arts and culture, or serve as workshop presenters. Others help document the work.
CAPE Professional Development Services:
- Full length, credit courses taught by staff and education and artist partners. These 15 hour courses (3-five hour or 5- three hour meetings at host school) “allow teachers to immerse themselves in the process of making art, as well as to develop an understanding of how to connect art making to core curriculum content areas.” (CAPE). Topics include: arts integration methodologies, collaboration, and documentation strategies.
- State certified professional development helps teachers with recertification
Collaborations have included:
- Bureau of Cultural Arts of Chicago Public Schools and CAPE work together on research-based initiative: Improving Academic Achievement Through the Arts in.
- Developing Early Literacies Through the Arts (DELTA): Intensive professional development relationships with schools on literacy development in grades 1 - 3.
- Middle School and High School International Baccalaureate programs in Chicago Public Schools.
Fine and Performing Arts Magnet Cluster Program in the Office of Academic Enhancement of Chicago Public Schools:
This program, involving 58 Chicago public schools spread throughout the city, and focused on arts teachers, has partnered with CAPE through a U.S. Department of Education grant to develop the capacity of arts specialists in schools as professional development providers and academic leaders in their schools. The professional development provided by CAPE to these arts teachers in leadership skills and in peer professional development strategies has created a new sense of community between arts teachers in all disciplines across the city, and promises to improve both instruction in the arts and to create greater buy-in for the arts among classroom teachers. The success of the professional development approach taken by the Fine and Performing Arts Magnet Cluster is being looked at as a model for the other Magnet Cluster programs in the Office of Academic Enhancement: Mathematics and Science, World Language, and Literature and Writing. CAPE is excited to see professional development in the arts being recognized as making significant contributions to broader thinking about whole school improvement.

Strategies:
- Engage external researchers to study all CAPE professional development programs
- Engage full time research associate to coordinate data collection
- Provide a feedback loop between researchers and teachers and artists to inform the on-going development of CAPE's professional development

History: 1991-92 Group of Chicago interested philanthropies and corporations examines limitations of AIE model, absence of arts-integration in public schools, led by Marshall Field’s Kassie Davis.
1992-93 Needs and resources assessment by Artsvision, Inc. Chicago Public Schools in change around arts, recently provided ½ time art or music educators in schools that had been without any (Catterall and Waldorf). Philanthropy group forms and supports CAPE as 6-year demonstration project. Hires Executive Director, begins forming alliances across arts, philanthropy, and school reform communities. Receives proposals from 64, which is about 1/3 of Chicago schools.
1993-94 Planning year, 14 partnerships selected. Workshops, planning meetings, pilot projects.
1994-97 Year 1- Year 3 Implementation: CAPE partnerships develop, CAPE staff provides technical assistance. Research team engaged (NCREL) for longitudinal study. Schools expand from single grade level participation to multiple grades. Begin to participate in national initiative with a network of researchers, Champions of Change. CAPE advises programs in other states; CAPE-influenced models emerge in US and abroad. Joins 4-year Chicago Students at the Center initiative with Chicago-area writing, history, and algebra projects, studying student-centered learning, professional development.
1997-1999 Year 4- 5 Implementation: Collect examples of exemplary arts integrated curricula. Begin sharing lessons learned, writing Renaissance in Classroom. Plans for and selects 11 of 20 proposals for CAPE II partnerships. Eight original CAPE schools invited back. Champions of Change released. Aprill co-authors Learning Partnerships (see useful tools).
1999-2002 Cape II partnerships begin. Teacher, artist, parent leaders emerge; engaged more in teaching, presenting locally and nationally. CAPE II schools develop curricular practices based on CAPE I partnerships; form overall CAPE network. Renaissance released.
2002-2003 CAPE focuses network on documentation. National Endowment for the Arts grant to help new schools and artists begin new CAPE partnerships. Ford Foundation leadership award to Aprill, opening work up further to a multi-disciplinary, international network.
2004-2008 Partners continue to receive project funds to work with CAPE. Chicago Public Schools – CAPE partnerships receive three US Department of Education grants, expanding professional development to over 100 Chicago pubic schools. CAPE initiates after school programming supported by the Illinois State Board of Education Federal Grants and Programs Division, though the U.S. Department of Education 21st Century Community Learning Centers.

Resources: History includes: Collaborative group of philanthropies and corporations fund 6-year demonstration. GE Fund (now GE Foundation) supports multi-year involvement in assessment, including investigations of effects on student learning. 2003 Ford Foundation awards Aprill Leadership for Changing World award: $100,000 to advance CAPE’s work , plus $15,000 to strengthen skills.
CAPE makes sure teachers and artists to participate in professional development. Teachers: union negotiated rate, ranging $26- $50/ hour, paid by school district Teaching artists: $50/ hour, paid by CAPE. Content: presenters and researchers @ $500-$1000/ day
Costs to school for fee-for-services: *15 hour course: $4,500 for 2-3 presenters and refreshments * ½ day workshop: $500 for up to 30 participants * planning assistance – for schools starting arts integration: $3,000
Sources of support: Individual donors Private foundations Corporations Government grants

Findings : Evaluation work by North Central Regional Laboratory (NCREL) and James Catterall and Lynn Waldorf of the University of California Los Angeles’ Imagination Project; Gail Burnaford, Olga Vazquez, James McLaughlin at Florida Atlantic University; Larry Scripp at New England Conservatory, Karen DeMoss at University of New Mexico, Louanne Smolin at National-Louis University
Methods:
Examined effects on students and teachers, changes in standardized reading and mathematics scores, changes in student creative and critical thinking skills, impacts of after school programs on in school teaching and learning, development of reflective practice among teachers. Used multiple methods, including focus groups, document review, case studies, observations, interviews, surveys.
Findings include:
- Teacher change- most developed arts-integrated units (74%).
- School approach change - over 90% report integration of CAPE into school.
- 91% educators reporting collaborations with teaching artists. More success in co planning than co-teaching.
- Positive student attitude towards arts integrated teaching approach
- Evidence for strong, significant achievement effects in elementary grades. For example, before CAPE school averaged around 40% of 6th graders performing at or above grade level in math; seven years of CAPE showed overall an overall rise to 60%. The average for all Chicago schools changed from 28% of 6th graders performing at or above grade level in math to around 40%. (Catterall and Waldorf) p.54-55.
- Arts-integrated teaching contributes to workplace and life skills; more than non-integrated classes.
- Helpful qualities for those who teach in CAPE schools:
- Teachers: openness, willingness to risk, arts interest/ background, also willingness to seek arts training, to collaborate.
- Artists: communication, planning, classroom management skills, love of art.

Lessons Learned:
Form a professional community across schools. Connect the resources of communities to the resources of schools. Provide occasions for teachers, artists, community members, and students to reflect on effective learning as a shared community. Leadership and full community involvement mature the program.
Involve people from different perspectives. Varied perspectives in the partnerships help everyone see more clearly “The actual collaboration and co-planning between people of different expertise is a significant piece of the professional development.” (Aprill)
Flexibility and adaptability are key.
No cookie cutter. Help them develop their own answers, CAPE facilitates rather than imposes. CAPE serves as a resource, finding answers and support, and a convener, helping others learn from successes and challenges across the city. The network needs to develop the criteria for excellence.
Lift them up to be seen. By involving practitioners in national and international learning communities, they gain new insight into the work’s importance and fresh ideas for improving it.
Increase capacity. CAPE workshops helped teachers and artists learn how to develop integrated arts units.
Students and peers can be unexpected allies. They are part of the collaboration and bring interesting, innovative connections to the work. (Burnaford, et al.) p.34
Support the inquiry process. Support teachers and artists so they can ask questions about their practice and find ways to seek the answers. Veterans rediscover curiosity. Novices join the professional community.
Share research. Practitioners need to present their research to each other and analyze what about other’s research is meaningful to their own work: What it would look like in the classroom.
Documentation is important. It provides concrete evidence of learning and helps clarify the learning, assist in educational planning and tells the learning story.
Principals are key players. Researchers describe how principals can be a key player in making collaborative opportunities possible.
Encourage teacher leadership. Develop positive leadership opportunities so that teachers see themselves as leaders.
Support the destabilization of entrenched, ineffective teaching practices. Develop, test and refine effective new teaching practices. Meaningfully challenge both novice and veteran teachers and artists
Teacher planning time is necessary. Teachers’ schedules are overloaded and Arts specialists are often scheduled out of collaboration.
Example: Some Chicago schools “bank time”, where they start school a little earlier every day, then every other Friday have a school planning period.
Strategically use existing planning time. There’ s not enough to waste. Do “administrivia” remotely, use face to face time intentionally. Provide planning tools and link to grade level meetings.
Budget money to pay teachers for planning, documentation, and reflection time. The planning is more important than the extra funding for program delivery.
Turn after school programs into laboratories for in school planning. It can be a safe space for teachers to try new teaching strategies and critique their work. For instance, without time constraints, teachers can spend several weeks on watercolor before deciding which areas to concentrate on during the school day.
Elicit positive leadership from students. Connect the lives of students in-school with their lives out-of-school and provide opportunities for them to actively contribute.

Useful Tools: Documentation from action research by CAPE educator-artist partnerships http://www.capeweb.org/rexamples.html CAPE Planning and Assessment Tools http://www.capeweb.org/forms.html
Moving Toward a Culture of Evidence: Documentation and Action Research Inside CAPE Veteran Partnerships. Veteran Partnerships Report 2005-2006. http://www.capeweb.org/cape_research/gb_vet.pdf
Making Learning Visible: Children as Individual and Group Learners (Project Zero and Reggio Children, 2002). CAPE applies the Reggio Emilia pre-school approach to documentation and the learner to K-12 education. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/mlv/index.cfm
Renaissance in the Classroom: Arts Integration and Meaningful Learning, editors Gail Burnaford, Arnold Aprill, Cynthia Weiss. (Burnaford, et al.). http://www.capeweb.org/fpubs.html Learning Partnerships: Improving Learning in Schools with Arts Partners in the Community http://www.aep-arts.org/publications/info.htm?publication_id=15 Co-authored by Aprill, Deasy, and Dreezsen, published by Arts Education Partnership, U.S. Department of Education, National Endowment for the Arts

References: Aprill, Arnold. "Arts Integration EVOLUTION: CAPE's Evolving Understanding of Effective Arts Integration.", 2004.
Aprill, Arnold. Letter to Dawn M. Ellis. 10 Jan. 2006.
Aprill, Arnold (aaprill@capeweb.org). "CAPE PD Costs." E-mail to Dawn M. Ellis(artslearning@comcast.net). 27 January 2006.
Aprill, Arnold (aaprill@capeweb.org). "Re: Profile for Review: Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education." E-mail to Dawn M. Ellis (artsedpd@comcast.net). 24 April 2006.
Aprill, Arnold, and Gail Burnaford. The CAPE Case Study: Arts Education As a Mechanism for Effective Innovation in Teacher Professional Development.: CAPE.
Renaissance in the Classroom: Arts Integration and Meaningful Learning. Gail Burnaford, et al. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. xxxv-xliv, 25 50, 157-81.
CAPE. About the Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education (CAPE). 2006. Web Page. URL: http://www.capeweb.org/about.html. 6 June 2006.
Catterall, James S., and Lynn Waldorf. "Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education Summary Evaluation." Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning. research study. Editor Edward B. Fiske. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership/ President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities,1999. 48-62.
Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education. CAPE Home Page. 2003. Web Page. URL: http://www.capeweb.org/. 30 June 2003.
Dreeszen, Craig. "Learning Partnerships: Planning and Evaluation Workbooks.", 2001. 66.
Dreeszen, Craig, Arnold Aprill, and Richard Deasy. Learning Partnerships: Improving Learning in Schools With Arts Partners in the Community. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership, 1999.

|
|
 |

Target Population:
Arts Specialists

Classroom Teachers

Education Administrators

Parents

Arts Discipline:
Interdisciplinary arts and other subjects

Music

Theatre/Drama

Visual Arts

Entry Points:
Inquire

Rally

Deepen

Connect

Transform

Sustain

Education Thread:
Partnership

|
 |